Is Foreign Interference Undermining Australian Democracy? The Case of Hasbara

 The term "Hasbara," a Hebrew word for "explanation," might sound innocuous enough. However, as this blog post will explain, it refers to a highly organised and strategic communications effort by the Israeli government and its supporters. This campaign aims to shape public opinion and control narratives surrounding Israeli actions and policies, and it’s having a significant impact right here in Australia [1-3]. While "Hasbara" might be intended to "tell Israel’s side of the story," critics argue that it often crosses the line into propaganda, presenting a biased and one-sided version of events, that ignores legitimate criticisms.

How Does Hasbara Operate?


Hasbara employs a range of sophisticated tactics, including:

  • Mass Media and Social Media Campaigns: These include paid social media posts and carefully crafted messages designed to sway public opinion.

  • Targeting Politicians and Diplomats: Hasbara actively seeks to influence those in power.

  • Educational and Cultural Programs: These initiatives aim to foster goodwill towards Israel.

  • Strategic Use of Language: This is intended to frame discussions in a way that favours the Israeli narrative.

  • Online Operations: Hasbara also involves online "mobs" that attack critics, spread disinformation, and ruin people's reputations.

The "Anti-Semitism Crisis" and its Political Use


One of the most concerning aspects of Hasbara's influence in Australia is the alleged exaggeration of the "anti-Semitism crisis" for political gain.

According to the "West Report," this is used as a tool to silence dissent, with the threat of being labelled anti-Semitic used as a weapon to destroy careers and reputations. Despite claims of an anti-Semitism crisis, the sources point out that there have been very few reports of physical injuries from such attacks.


This narrative, the sources suggest, is used by pro-Israel lobby groups to push their political agenda. The "West Report" argues that these groups are "blowing out of all proportion this anti-Semitism crisis for their own political ends for the benefit in fact of a foreign Nation". This raises serious questions about foreign interference in Australian domestic politics and the weaponisation of accusations of anti-Semitism to shut down any criticism of the state of Israel.


Hasbara's Impact on Australian Politics and Society


The sources suggest that Hasbara is having a detrimental effect on Australian politics and social cohesion. Some of the key impacts include:


  • Foreign Interference: Pro-Israel lobby groups, some of which are publicly funded charities, are accused of acting as agents of foreign interference in Australia. These groups are also accused of attacking Australian political parties for not supporting Israel enough.

  • Demonization Tactics: Hasbara tactics include demonizing Muslims, Arabs, and particularly Palestinians, as well as anyone who supports peace or criticizes the Israeli government.

  • Media Influence: The mainstream media is accused of being "cowed" into accepting the hasbara narrative or running with it for its own political agendas, thereby failing to investigate the issue effectively.

  • Division of the Jewish Community: Many Jewish Australians oppose the actions of Zionist groups and their hasbara tactics, but their voices are often drowned out by the "cacophony of whining victimhood" coming from these organisations].

  • Lobbying and Political Activity: Some charities are accused of engaging in political lobbying, which is against the rules of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission. The Australian Jewish Association (AJA), for example, is identified as a charity that openly attacks political parties, and seems closely linked to the LNP. David Adler (who has been President), for example:





David Adler and Tony Abbott:


Advance backers:

Advance backers

Adler (AJA) and LNP involved in QLD:


Other interactions:




One interesting quote includes; "Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council national chairman Mark Leibler, a prominent Indigenous rights activist who co-chaired the Referendum Council, said that due to the AJA’s “misleading name”, it is very important for people within the Jewish community, but also people outside the Jewish community, to “understand that this organisation and this person, they do not speak for us”." Is he just a 'voice' for the right or the LNP?


It is also interesting to note that the Australian Jewsish Assocation (AJA) The AJA, founded in 2017, represents a conservative, Orthodox-aligned faction within the Jewish community:
  • Leadership: President Dr. David Adler, a former AMA deputy medical secretary, promotes "Torah values" and strong support for Israel. The AJA positions itself as a counter to mainstream Jewish organizations it views as overly progressive.
  • Activities:
    • Regularly critiques government responses to antisemitism, blaming the Labor administration for rising violence.
    • Engages with conservative media (e.g., Sky News Australia) and far-right figures like Pauline Hanson.
  • Controversies:
    • Labeled "extremist" by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) and Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) for its hardline stances.
    • Accused of inflaming tensions by describing pro-Palestine university encampments as "Nazi encampments".

Connections and Tensions

While no direct financial links between the AJA and Israeli entities are documented, ideological alignment is evident:
  • The AJA advocates for policies mirroring Israeli government priorities, including opposition to UN motions critical of Israel.
  • AIJAC and Hasbara-linked groups focus on elite political lobbying, whereas the AJA employs confrontational media tactics.
  • Internal Jewish community divisions persist, with mainstream groups like ECAJ distancing themselves from the AJA's methods.
The AJA's hardline positions have created tensions within the Australian Jewish community. Mainstream organizations like the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) have distanced themselves from the AJA, labeling it as an "extremist" group.

It is my understanding that registered charities that get various tax concessions etc have ACNC rules that they should comply with. This include limitations etc on political involvement.

Clearly, the AJA seems very willing to be involved politically:







Also interesting to note how the increase in these alleged attacks have occured as we head towards a Federal election. What a coincidence?




  • Social Media Operations: Israeli online operations are accused of using social media to bully, harass, spread disinformation, and ruin people’s reputations.

  • Suppression of Dissent: Critics of Israel are often labelled as anti-Semitic or terrorist supporters, and the "threat of being branded anti-semitic" is used to silence dissent and destroy reputations.

  • The Conflict as a Political Contest: Hasbara has been framing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a political issue, with the left seen as pro-Palestinian and the right as pro-Israel. This is having an impact on Australian elections and public debate].

  • Undermining Social Cohesion: Hasbara is contributing to "upheaval in Australian politics" and is a "massive problem for Australian domestic politics and social cohesion".

The Need for Action


The sources call for a number of actions to combat the negative effects of hasbara:


  • Deregistration of Charities: There are calls for the Australian government to deregister pro-Israel lobby groups that operate as charities due to their involvement in political lobbying, and as agents of foreign interference.

  • Media Scrutiny: There is a need for greater media scrutiny of hasbara tactics and the misinformation they spread.

  • Dialogue: The sources suggest facilitating dialogue between Jewish and Muslim leaders to create greater consensus and unity.

  • Recognition of Complexity: The sources note that the Israel-Palestine conflict is a complex issue, not a partisan political issue that divides the left and the right.

Conclusion


Hasbara represents a sophisticated and sometimes aggressive campaign to influence public opinion in Australia. It uses tactics such as demonization, exaggeration, and disinformation to achieve its goals. The sources raise concerns about its impact on social cohesion and domestic politics, and warn that these actions are contributing to the rise of anti-semitism by exaggerating the crisis and silencing dissent. It is clear that Hasbara is not merely about "explaining" but is, in fact, a complex and controversial form of foreign interference that is actively undermining Australian social cohesion and democratic processes.


The need for vigilance and critical analysis of Hasbara and its effect on Australian politics has never been more important.


PODCAST:



VIDEO:





Citations:


[1] https://www.newarab.com/news/understanding-hasbara-israels-propaganda-machine

[2] https://tampere2020.iamcr.org/iamcr.org/node/13130.html

[3] https://www.dailysabah.com/op-ed/2018/05/09/israel-the-state-of-hasbara

[4] https://mepc.org/speeches/hasbara-and-control-narrative-element-strategy/

[5] https://www.restlessbeings.org/articles/what-is-hasbara

[6] https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/the-art-of-deception-how-israel-uses-hasbara-to-whitewash-its-crimes-12766404

[7] https://vashtimedia.com/zionism-israel-palestine-gaza-hasbara-america-propaganda/

[8] https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/hasbara-a-long-running-strategy/

[9] https://jcpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Contemporary-Origins-of-Hasbara.pdf

[10] https://mondediplo.com/2024/05/03hasbara

[11] https://youtu.be/6YKLjsICAh4?list=TLGGq7rjXpmKWw0zMTAxMjAyNQ

[12] https://michaelwest.com.au/inside-the-arc-of-israel-influence-in-the-queensland-election/

[13] https://www.australianjewishnews.com/adler-doesnt-represent-anybody/

[14]https://theconversation.com/israel-piles-on-criticism-of-australia-over-antisemitism-while-answers-to-key-questions-elude-authorities-248006

[15]https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/zionist-lobby-shaking-up-politics-in-australia-and-uk,18764

[16]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Jewish_Association

[17]https://thejewishindependent.com.au/jewish-alt-right-close-personal-new-australian-conservative-jewish-movement

[18]https://thejewishindependent.com.au/michael-gawenda-truths-and-myths-about-australias-israel-lobby







The Politics of Fear: Peter Dutton's Controversial Legacy


Explore the divisive rhetoric and controversial statements of Australia's Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, from his comments on Muslim immigrants to his stance on African gangs and refugee policies.Peter Dutton, the current leader of the opposition in Australia, has long been a polarizing figure in the country's political landscape. His career has been marked by a series of controversial statements and policy positions that have often been criticized as fear-mongering and divisive. This blog post delves into Dutton's history of contentious remarks and actions, examining their impact on Australian society and politics.

The Muslim Controversy

One of the most persistent themes in Dutton's political career has been his comments about Muslim immigrants. In 2016, he sparked outrage by suggesting that former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser had made a mistake in allowing Lebanese Muslims to migrate to Australia in the 1970s
1
.
 Dutton claimed that out of 33 people charged with terrorist-related offenses, 22 were from second and third-generation Lebanese-Muslim backgrounds
1
.
More recently, in July 2024, Dutton stirred controversy again by warning about a potential "Muslim political alliance" in Western Sydney, describing it as a "disaster" if included in a future government
3
.
 These remarks have been widely criticized as fueling Islamophobia and divisiveness in Australian society.

The "African Gangs" Narrative

Another contentious issue in Dutton's political career has been his stance on what he termed "African gang violence" in Victoria. In 2018, he claimed that Victorians were "scared to go out" due to this perceived threat
1
.
 Following the tragic stabbing of Laa Chol in Melbourne, Dutton blamed "Victoria's gang problem" and asserted that Melburnians were afraid to dine out due to violence perpetrated by South Sudanese people
1
.
These statements were widely criticized as exaggerations that unfairly targeted the African community in Melbourne. Despite the backlash, Dutton has stood by his comments, insisting that the incidents were related to "kids, predominantly from a particular community"
1
.

Controversial Refugee and Immigration Policies

Dutton's approach to refugee and immigration policies has also been a source of controversy:
  1. In 2018, he supported fast-track visas for white South African farmers, describing them as "persecuted" and needing help from a "civilized" country
    2
    .
  2. In August 2024, he criticized the government for accepting refugees from Gaza, claiming it put national security at risk
    2
    .
  3. In 2019, he referred to the children of asylum seekers as "anchor babies," implying they were being used to leverage migration outcomes
    2
    .

A Pattern of Divisive Rhetoric

Throughout his political career, Dutton has consistently made statements that have been perceived as divisive and fear-mongering. His comments have often targeted minority groups, particularly Muslims and African immigrants, and have been criticized for potentially fueling racism and xenophobia in Australia.Critics argue that Dutton's approach to politics relies heavily on creating division and fear. As one commentator noted, "Dutton has taken the title of 'opposition' leader so literally that he's unwilling to meet the government halfway on just about anything"
3
.

The Impact on Australian Politics

Dutton's controversial statements and policies have had a significant impact on Australian politics. They have sparked intense debates about racism, immigration, and national security. While his supporters argue that he's addressing real concerns, his critics contend that his rhetoric is harmful and divisive.As Australia moves forward, the country must grapple with the legacy of such divisive politics. The challenge lies in fostering a political discourse that addresses genuine concerns while promoting unity and respect for all members of society.In conclusion, Peter Dutton's political career serves as a stark reminder of the power of words in shaping public opinion and policy. As Australians continue to debate these issues, it's crucial to strive for a balanced approach that ensures national security while upholding the values of inclusivity and multiculturalism that have long been a part of Australian society.

Divisive Dutton



Citations:

[1] https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/no-place-in-australia-peter-duttons-justification-of-historic-racist-comments-criticised/gy3ikspsf

[2] https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/65-reasons-why-dutton-is-unfit-to-be-pm,18924

[3] https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/fuelling-islamophobia-from-the-top-duttons-penchant-for-fear-and-division-knows-no-bounds/

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Dutton

[5] https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/why-duttons-playing-a-very-dangerous-political-game/

[6] https://insidestory.org.au/good-cop-bad-cop/

[7] https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/38-0809-FinalReport.pdf

[8] https://theconversation.com/with-dutton-in-defence-the-morrison-government-risks-progress-on-climate-and-indigenous-affairs-158420

[9] https://www.thepolicypost.net/2022/08/rednecks-on-run-how-australiatransforme.html

[10] https://www.mondaq.com/australia/criminal-law/1552526/complaint-lodged-against-peter-dutton-for-inciting-hatred-towards-palestinians

[11] https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/dutton-and-the-coalition-ramping-up-fear-and-racism,11085

[12] https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/lachlan363/episodes/Duttons-Downfall-Unpacking-a-Career-of-Controversy-e2sllh7

[13] https://cpa.org.au/guardian/issue-2121/the-nefarious-history-of-peter-dutton/

[14] https://readingmattersblog.com/2025/01/12/bad-cop-peter-duttons-strongman-politics-by-lech-blaine-quarterly-essay-93/

[15] https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/no-place-in-australia-peter-duttons-justification-of-historic-racist-comments-criticised/gy3ikspsf

[16] https://blakandblack.com/2024/11/26/the-unraveling-of-peter-dutton-a-pattern-of-controversy-and-incompetence/

[17] https://sajjeling.com/2016/12/31/the-politics-and-consequences-of-peter-duttons-comments/

[18] https://asylumseekerscentre.org.au/people-seeking-asylum-in-australia-shouldnt-have-to-trade-danger-for-degradation/

[19] https://www.reddit.com/r/australian/comments/1hq16ws/albanese_orders_victorian_labor_to_take_down/

[20] https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/peter-duttons-strange-conflation-of-events-is-a-recurring-theme-in-his-leadership-his-latest-should-be-the-last-straw/

[21] https://www.reddit.com/r/AustralianPolitics/comments/11o0u70/whats_the_scam_with_nines_panel_of_experts_red/