In the dynamic world of Australian politics, two organizations have carved out significant roles in shaping conservative discourse and policy-making: the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) and Advance Australia. Both entities are intricately connected to the right-wing political spectrum and the Liberal-National Party (LNP) coalition, influencing both policy formation and grassroots mobilization. Their power within Australia’s political landscape is substantial, yet their involvement also stirs ongoing controversy and debate. Understanding the rise and impact of these organizations is key to comprehending the broader narrative of conservative politics in Australia.
The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA)
A Legacy of Conservative Thought
The Institute of Public Affairs, founded in 1943, is one of the longest-standing conservative think tanks in Australia. Over the course of its 80-year history, the IPA has consistently advocated for free-market policies, small government, and individual liberties. The longevity of this think tank points to its resilience and sustained impact on public policy, especially within right-wing politics.
From its inception, the IPA positioned itself as a voice for conservative ideals, rallying behind policies that prioritize deregulation, privatization, and low taxation. It was created during a time when Australia was transitioning into post-war recovery, and the IPA seized the opportunity to promote a pro-business, anti-socialist agenda. It can be argued that this was the foundation of its enduring role as a central player in conservative circles.
Shaping Liberal Party Policies
The IPA's influence on Australian politics is particularly notable in its close association with the Liberal Party. Far from being a mere think tank on the sidelines, the IPA has often shaped the very heart of the Liberal Party's policy directions. Its proposals on economic reform, climate change, and industrial relations are often echoed in the policies of Liberal governments, marking its role as more than just an observer in the political process.
For instance, the IPA has consistently pushed for tax reforms, deregulation, and the curtailing of union powers, which align closely with the policies of Liberal leadership over the past decades. While it doesn't officially dictate party policy, its influence can be seen in key legislative pushes and political platforms, making the IPA a force behind the scenes in Canberra’s political corridors.
Strong Ties to the Liberal Party
The IPA's connections to the Liberal Party extend beyond policy influence. Many of its members, staff, and contributors have gone on to hold significant positions within the party or government. These close relationships have led to accusations that the IPA acts almost as an informal arm of the Liberal Party, rather than as an independent entity.
A revolving door of personnel between the IPA and the Liberal Party creates an environment where ideas and strategies are seamlessly transferred between the think tank and political office. Critics argue that this relationship has muddied the waters between independent research and political maneuvering, giving the IPA undue influence over government decisions. This proximity to power, while advantageous for the IPA’s agenda, has also drawn scrutiny from those who question its level of impartiality.
Controversies and Criticisms
The IPA’s close ties to business interests have also led to considerable criticism. Its advocacy for deregulation and reduced government intervention often mirrors the interests of large corporations, sparking accusations that the think tank acts more in the interests of big business than of the general public. Furthermore, the IPA has faced backlash for its stance on climate change, with critics arguing that its skepticism of climate science aligns too conveniently with industries like fossil fuels.
These criticisms have not stopped the IPA from continuing to wield influence. In fact, they have only sharpened the focus on its role in shaping policy debates in Australia, raising questions about the ethical boundaries between research, business, and politics.
Advance Australia
A New Player in Conservative Activism
Founded in 2018, Advance Australia quickly made its mark as a conservative activist group, standing in stark contrast to progressive movements like GetUp!. Unlike the IPA, which engages in high-level policy discussions, Advance Australia focuses on grassroots mobilization, using campaigns to rally conservative voters around specific issues.
This newer organization is a key player in conservative politics, often operating as a direct counterforce to progressive movements and left-leaning policies. Its mission is clear: to protect and promote Australian values from what it sees as a left-wing overreach, particularly on issues like climate action, immigration, and the economy.
Countering Progressive Initiatives
Advance Australia’s most high-profile campaigns have often involved a response to progressive agendas. Whether countering climate activism, welfare policies, or social issues, it sees itself as the defender of traditional values.
One of its key battles has been against the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, where it played a prominent role in advocating for a ‘No’ vote during the 2023 Indigenous Voice referendum. This campaign demonstrated Advance Australia’s willingness to step into highly divisive national debates and use its platform to shape public opinion on sensitive issues.
Right-Wing Agenda and LNP Connections
Though Advance Australia may position itself as a grassroots organization, its leadership and funding reveal strong ties to the Liberal Party. Several of its founders and major supporters have previously worked with or for the LNP, and this connection is reflected in the group's focus on right-wing causes that align closely with the party’s goals.
Advance Australia has also been unafraid to launch highly controversial campaigns—often with provocative rhetoric—to galvanize its base. This boldness has made it a lightning rod for attention and a significant force in steering political discourse among conservative voters.
Controversial Campaigns
Advance Australia thrives on engaging in contentious debates, and its campaigns often generate widespread public interest—both supportive and critical. Apart from the Indigenous Voice referendum, the group has also rallied against progressive stances on gender issues, renewable energy, and immigration. It has been accused of running misleading or overly simplistic campaigns, yet this aggressive style has proven effective in mobilizing a dedicated conservative base.
The Impact on Australian Politics
Policy Influence
Both the IPA and Advance Australia play critical roles in shaping the direction of Australian conservative policies. Through their respective focuses—policy research for the IPA and voter mobilization for Advance Australia—these organizations have cultivated strong voices within the political debate. Whether it's the IPA’s influence on economic and climate policies or Advance Australia’s ability to rally public opinion, their collective impact on the Liberal-National coalition is undeniable.
Grassroots Mobilization
The combination of high-level policy influence and grassroots campaigning has allowed these two organizations to affect politics on multiple levels. While the IPA influences decision-makers in government, Advance Australia amplifies conservative voices in the general public, ensuring that right-wing issues maintain prominence in the national conversation. This powerful combination strengthens conservative positions within the political spectrum, especially during elections or key national referenda.
Shaping Public Discourse
Through media outreach, publications, and highly visible campaigns, both the IPA and Advance Australia have succeeded in shaping public discourse around key national issues. They provide a conservative lens through which Australians engage with debates on climate change, taxation, social policies, and more. Their ability to frame political issues from a right-wing perspective ensures that conservative narratives remain influential in Australia’s political and social discussions.
Why?
Political parties often utilize organizations like the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) and Advance Australia for several strategic reasons:
1. Policy development and testing:
These organizations can develop and promote policy ideas that align with the party's ideology, but without the party having to directly advocate for them initially. This allows parties to gauge public reaction before officially adopting certain policies[1].
2. Disguising partisan agendas:
By having ostensibly independent groups promote certain ideas, parties can push their agendas while maintaining plausible deniability. This helps avoid direct criticism of the party itself[1][4].
3. Expanding influence:
These organizations often have extensive media presence and public outreach capabilities. They can promote party-aligned ideas to a broader audience than the party might reach on its own[1][2].
4. Providing intellectual credibility:
Think tanks like the IPA can lend an air of academic or intellectual legitimacy to party policies, making them seem more thoroughly researched and credible[3].
5. Circumventing donation limits:
While there are limits on direct donations to political parties, these organizations can accept large donations and use them to campaign on issues that benefit certain parties[2][5].
6. Creating a permanent campaign infrastructure:
Groups like Advance Australia provide parties with a constant campaigning capability outside of election cycles, keeping their messages in the public eye[5].
7. Attacking opponents:
These organizations can engage in more aggressive messaging or attacks on opponents than parties might feel comfortable doing directly[2].
8. Influencing public debate:
By having multiple voices advocating for similar positions, parties can shape public discourse and move the "Overton window" of acceptable policy ideas in their preferred direction[3].
9. Providing a talent pool:
These organizations often serve as training grounds for future party staffers, candidates, and leaders[1][4].
10. Countering opposing groups:
They can serve as counterweights to progressive organizations like GetUp!, allowing conservative parties to have similar campaigning capabilities[5].
By utilizing these organizations, political parties can effectively extend their reach, influence, and messaging capabilities beyond their official party structures, while maintaining a degree of separation that can be politically advantageous.
Funding
We can glean some relevant insights:
1. The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) is registered as a charity:
The IPA is described as "a registered charity that advocates in favour of free market policies and routinely discourages action on climate change"[9]. As a registered charity, the IPA is exempt from paying taxes and is not legally required to publicly disclose its donors[9].
2. IPA relies entirely on donations:
The IPA "relies entirely on donations" for its funding[9]. In 2017, 86% of its total income came from individual donors, while only 1% came from businesses[9].
3. IPA's charitable status provides financial benefits:
Due to its charitable status, the IPA can receive tax-deductible donations[6]. Their website encourages supporters to "Make a donation to the IPA today" and notes that donations are tax-deductible[6].
4. Advance Australia is not a charity:
Unlike the IPA, Advance Australia explicitly states that it is "not a charity and we don't want or accept funding from any government"[11]. This suggests they do not use charitable status for fundraising.
5. Lack of transparency in funding:
Both organizations have been criticized for a lack of transparency regarding their donors. The IPA has "refused to reveal who's funding its research, citing concerns over the privacy of its donors"[4]. Advance Australia states they will comply with electoral commission disclosure requirements but does not plan to publish donor details on their website[10].
6. Significant funding from undisclosed sources:
Advance Australia received $5.2 million in donations in one year, with $2.4 million (47%) coming from undisclosed sources[8]. This has led to accusations of "dark money" funding[8].
While there's no explicit evidence of these organizations using charities as a funding conduit, the IPA's charitable status does provide it with financial advantages in terms of tax benefits and reduced disclosure requirements. Advance Australia, while not a charity itself, also benefits from limited disclosure requirements for political donations. Both organizations have faced criticism for their lack of transparency regarding funding sources.
Institute of Public Affairs (IPA)
The IPA, an 80-year-old free-market think tank, has strong ties to the Liberal Party and advocates for conservative economic and climate policies [13]. Its funding structure includes:
Corporate donors with stakes in climate change debates, contributing about a quarter of its $2 million annual funding [14]
Significant donations from mining magnate Gina Rinehart, including $2.3 million in 2016 and $2.2 million in 2017 through her company Hancock Prospecting [14]
Contributions from businesses such as ExxonMobil, Telstra, Philip Morris, and British American Tobacco [13]
Support from the Liberal Party-associated Cormack Foundation [13]
Advance Australia
Founded in 2018, Advance Australia focuses on grassroots mobilization and countering progressive initiatives. Its funding sources include:
Over $5.2 million in donations received in the last year alone
Approximately 47% ($2.4 million) of its funds coming from unknown sources or untraceable "dark money" [12]
Implications
The significant financial backing of these organizations raises questions about their influence on public policy and political discourse. Critics argue that this funding structure allows corporate interests to shape political agendas without proper public scrutiny [12].
While these organizations claim to represent conservative values and grassroots interests, the substantial "dark money" and corporate funding they receive have led some to characterize them as "slush funds" for far-right interests [12].
As Australia grapples with critical issues like climate change and economic policy, the role of these well-funded conservative powerhouses in shaping the nation's future remains a topic of ongoing debate and concern.
Conclusion
The Institute of Public Affairs and Advance Australia represent two of the most potent forces driving conservative politics in Australia today. With their complementary strategies—one focusing on policy influence and the other on grassroots activism—they have reshaped the political landscape, ensuring that conservative values and perspectives remain central to national debates.
While their deep ties to the Liberal-National coalition provide them with significant influence, these relationships have also attracted criticism, raising concerns about the blending of political and corporate interests in policy-making. Nonetheless, the ongoing impact of both organizations is clear, and their role in Australian politics is likely to remain substantial as the country navigates the complex challenges of the 21st century.
FAQs
What is the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA)?
The IPA is one of Australia’s oldest conservative think tanks, founded in 1943, promoting free-market policies and conservative ideologies.How does Advance Australia influence politics?
Advance Australia focuses on grassroots mobilization, campaigning on specific conservative issues and rallying support among right-wing voters.What is the relationship between the IPA and the Liberal Party?
The IPA has strong ties to the Liberal Party, often influencing policy decisions through its research and advocacy for conservative principles.What controversies surround the IPA?
Critics accuse the IPA of aligning too closely with corporate interests and advancing policies that benefit large businesses, raising questions about its independence.What was Advance Australia's role in the 2023 Indigenous Voice referendum?
Advance Australia led a high-profile campaign opposing the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, advocating for a ‘No’ vote and mobilizing conservative voters.Why is Advance Australia often compared to GetUp!?
Advance Australia is seen as the conservative counterpart to the progressive activist group GetUp!, with both engaging in political campaigns to influence public opinion.Citations:
[1] https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/the-liberal-party-and-the-institute-of-public-affairs-who-is-whose,8837
[2] https://grattan.edu.au/report/whos-in-the-room/
[3] https://www.herinst.org/BusinessManagedDemocracy/government/national/IPA.html
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Public_Affairs
[5] https://thenightly.com.au/politics/australia/advance-australia-truth-trucks-and-dark-money-claims-where-will-this-controversial-group-turn-up-next-c-13958251
[6] https://members.ipa.org.au/donate/
[7] https://thenightly.com.au/politics/australia/advance-australia-truth-trucks-and-dark-money-claims-where-will-this-controversial-group-turn-up-next-c-13958251
[8] https://www.getup.org.au/media/releases/post/dark-money-fueling-advance-australia
[9] https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2018/07/24/ipa-membership-donors
[10] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-21/what-is-advance-australia/10520122
[11] https://www.advanceaustralia.org.au/donation-policy
[12] https://www.getup.org.au/media/releases/post/dark-money-fueling-advance-australia
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Public_Affairs
[14] https://www.desmog.com/institute-public-affairs/
Resources:
