Unmasking the Anti-Renewable Energy Disinformation Machine: How Fossil Fuel Interests Are Using "Astroturfing" to Deceive Australians

 

The fight against climate change is not just about scientific research and technological innovation; it's also a battle against misinformation and manipulation. In Australia, a sophisticated disinformation campaign is being waged against renewable energy, particularly offshore wind farms, and it's crucial to understand how these tactics work to protect our environment and the future of our planet. The anti-renewables movement is cloaking pro-fossil fuel agendas in the language of environmental and community concern, while remaining notably silent on the catastrophic impacts of fossil fuels.

The Rise of "Astroturfing": Fake Grassroots Movements

One of the key tactics employed in this disinformation campaign is the creation of fake grassroots movements, often referred to as “astroturfing.” These groups appear to be genuine community organisations, but they are actually funded and orchestrated by fossil fuel interests. These groups often use "slick," but anonymous websites to push pro-fossil fuel agendas while claiming to represent environmental and community concerns.

These "sham" community groups often import disinformation strategies from the US, using tactics and strategies previously used there. These groups heavily target local communities, particularly via social media, to spread their disinformation. Examples of these fake "grassroots" movements include websites like "No Offshore Wind Turbines," "Responsible Futures (Illawarra)," and "Australians Against Offshore Wind". These websites use the imagery and language of environmental concern, but they are silent on the catastrophic impacts of fossil fuels on ocean ecosystems.

Spreading False Claims: The "Whale Death" Lie

A prominent example of the false claims being spread is the assertion that offshore wind farms are "killing whales". This claim has been thoroughly debunked by experts. According to Benjamin Laws, deputy chief for permits and conservation at the NOAA’s Office of Protected Resources, there is no information supporting that offshore wind development could directly lead to whale deaths. Dr. Olaf Meynecke, a research fellow at Griffith University, also stated that claims of offshore wind "killing whales" are "absolutely incorrect".

Despite expert refutation, these false claims are widely circulated in anti-wind Facebook groups. This tactic demonstrates how disinformation campaigns use emotional appeals and false narratives to manipulate public opinion and create fear and uncertainty.

Key Players: Advance and Their Shadowy Network

At the heart of this disinformation campaign is a secretive lobby group called Advance. This group, which was behind the "No" campaign against the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, is now a key player in the anti-renewable energy disinformation campaign. Advance claims to be a grassroots movement of ordinary Australians, but it is actually bankrolled by a handful of mega-millionaires.

Advance operates through a shadowy network of at least six interconnected entities. It is also known that Advance is working in coordination with other entities, including US-style dark money lobby groups like the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) and the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS). These entities often refuse to disclose who funds them.

Financial Backers: The Fossil Fuel Billionaires

The financial backing of these anti-renewable energy campaigns is critical to their reach and impact. Key financial backers include:

• Bryant Macfie: A prominent climate denier who directed $900,000 to the Advance "No" campaign. Macfie also donated $350,000 to the University of Queensland for "climate research" while simultaneously attacking "climate activism".
• Trevor St Baker: A coal billionaire who donated $50,000 to Advance through his coal and gas power station company, St Baker Enterprises, in 2022-23.
• Gina Rinehart: A coal and mining multi-billionaire and one of the biggest funders of the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA). She is also an "honorary life member" of the IPA.

The anti-offshore wind network is funded by "big oil and coal," and between 2017 and 2021, fossil fuel interests gave US$16.28 million to a "grassroots-appearing coalition at the centre of the movement". This demonstrates the considerable financial resources being used to obstruct renewable energy.

A Transnational Project

The anti-wind disinformation campaign is not confined to Australia. It's a "transnational project" funded by big oil and coal. This coordinated effort involves importing tactics and strategies used in other countries, particularly the United States, where similar disinformation campaigns have been mapped out by Brown University researchers. This research shows that "fossil fuel interests are working with climate denial think tanks and community groups to obstruct offshore wind projects". The anti-renewable energy network shares personnel, talking points, legal support, and financial resources with organisations that have been blocking climate policy for decades.

The Goal: Protecting Fossil Fuel Profits

The underlying motivation for this disinformation campaign is to protect the profitability and power of the fossil fuel industry. By targeting communities near proposed offshore wind projects and spreading false claims, these groups aim to undermine public support for renewable energy and obstruct the clean energy rollout. These actions include campaigns against political actions "that stand to reduce the profitability and power of the fuel industry, such as Indigenous rights, carbon taxation, windfall taxes, resource rent taxes (and) the clean energy rollout".

Conclusion: The Need for Vigilance

The anti-renewable energy disinformation campaign is a well-funded and carefully orchestrated effort to deceive Australians and protect the fossil fuel industry. By creating fake grassroots movements, spreading false claims, and refusing to disclose their funding, these groups are undermining efforts to combat climate change.

It’s crucial for the public to be vigilant and critical of information they encounter, particularly on social media. We must support independent media and fact-checking organisations that are committed to exposing these deceptive tactics. By understanding how these disinformation campaigns operate, we can better defend ourselves and our planet from the influence of fossil fuel interests. The fight for a sustainable future depends on our ability to see through the lies and demand real action on climate change.

Australian Podcast:

Source: https://theklaxon.com.au/anti-voice-group-spreading-whale-death-lies/

China's Renewable Revolution: How the Dragon is Going Green and Changing the World

G’day, readers! Today we’re diving into a topic that’s both critical and bloody impressive: China's renewable energy revolution. For years, China was known as the world’s biggest emitter, but that’s changing faster than a summer storm in the outback. Now, they’re not just playing catch-up, they're leading the global charge towards a greener future. Let’s take a squiz at how they’ve managed this and what it all means.

Unprecedented Growth

The sheer scale of China’s renewable energy expansion is, frankly, unmatched. Over the last couple of decades, they've achieved growth in installed renewable capacity that has left the rest of the world in the dust. As one expert put it, “If I could sum this [trend] up in two words they would be: China, solar”. And they’re not just meeting targets; they're smashing them. China is on track to achieve its 2030 renewables targets by 2025, specifically the 1200 GW goal. That's five years ahead of schedule! By 2030, they’re expected to be responsible for more than half of the world's renewable energy capacity. They're building "twice as much wind and solar as the rest of the world combined". It's fair dinkum impressive!

Solar Power Domination

When it comes to solar, China is in a league of its own. They’re the world's largest producer of solar energy. In fact, China manufactures over 80% of the world’s solar PV panels. By the end of 2023, their solar PV capacity was expected to surpass 500 GW. They are well on the way to having a whopping 1 TW of installed solar PV capacity by 2026. Not only that, they’re constantly improving the tech, making it more cost-effective and efficient, including battery storage solutions. China installed about as much solar capacity as the rest of the world combined in 2022, and then doubled that in 2023.

Wind Power and Offshore Projects

But it's not just solar, they’re also making huge strides in wind power, with massive wind farms, including offshore projects. They've started their first gigawatt-level offshore solar project in Shandong province. In 2023, China increased its new wind capacity by 66%. The country aims to build over 200 utility-scale clean energy bases that combine vast solar arrays and wind farms. Shandong alone plans to add more than 11 GW of offshore wind by 2025.

Ambitious Targets

China has set some seriously ambitious goals. They aim for 80% of their total energy mix to come from non-fossil fuel sources by 2060. They're projected to reach 1,371 GW of combined wind and solar capacity by 2025, which is five years ahead of their original 2030 goal. By 2025, renewables are expected to account for 33% of China's national grid supply. The 14th Five Year Plan includes a goal of 33% of electricity generation from renewables by 2025. China is aiming to increase the share of non-fossil energy sources to 20% by 2025 and to 25% by 2030.

What's Driving this Renewable Surge?

So, what's behind this massive push? It’s a mix of strategic investment, government support, and a bit of political will. Back in the mid-2000s, they started investing heavily in renewables due to rising labour costs, pollution, and the opportunity to lead in the green energy space. The Chinese government has been very active in supporting renewable development through incentives, subsidies, policy integration, and clear signals to state-owned enterprises. Xi Jinping's pledge to peak emissions before 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2060, sent a powerful political signal in favour of renewable investments across China.

Global Impact and Influence

China's renewable energy push isn't just helping them; it’s having a big impact globally. Their large-scale production has driven down prices worldwide, making renewable systems more affordable for poorer countries. Through the Belt and Road Initiative, they're investing in and building solar projects in developing nations. They're also a major exporter of solar panels and technologies, influencing global solar markets. China's embrace of solar energy has not only transformed its own energy landscape but has also shaped global solar markets.

The Challenges Ahead

Of course, it's not all sunshine and rainbows. China still relies heavily on coal for about 70% of its electricity generation. The grid also struggles to integrate the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources. It is designed around the predictable output of coal power. There’s also been a recent surge in approvals for new coal-fired power plants, which isn’t helping their emission levels. Renewable energy use lags behind installed capacity.

Future Directions

To tackle these challenges, China is planning a unified national power market by 2030 to better manage renewable energy. They’re also working to enhance renewable energy consumption by upgrading infrastructure, electrifying industries, and promoting green tech. They know that better policies will lead to more adoption of renewable fuels and hydrogen.

China and the Global Climate Goals

China’s push into renewables is a major factor in the global push to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030. The International Energy Agency (IEA) noted that the 50% increase in global renewable installations in 2023 was largely due to China's contributions. By 2030, China is expected to be responsible for more than half of the world’s renewables. This acceleration is essential for the world to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Conclusion

China's renewable energy transformation is remarkable, they have emerged as a global leader in the space, and are setting a new bar for other countries. While there are still issues to iron out with the grid and dependence on coal, their achievements are a major step forward in tackling climate change. China isn't just talking the talk – they're walking the walk and doing it on a scale that's pretty mind-blowing. They've really grabbed the bull by the horns in their bid to secure their position as a leader in the green energy transition. The country’s role in the global renewable energy expansion is pivotal for achieving global climate goals.

Podcast:

Sources:

https://e360.yale.edu/features/china-renewable-energy

https://energydigital.com/renewable-energy/how-china-will-lead-the-green-energy-expansion

Tired of the Same Old Politics? Community Independents Offer a Fresh Start for Australian Democracy

 

Are you feeling like your voice isn't being heard in Canberra? Like the major parties are more interested in playing political games than addressing the real issues that matter to you and your community? If so, you're not alone. A growing number of Australians are turning to community independent candidates as a refreshing alternative to traditional party politics. But what exactly are community independents, and why should you consider voting for one in the upcoming 2025 federal election?

What Makes Community Independents Different?

Unlike candidates from the major political parties who are often bound by party platforms and directives, community independents are driven by the needs and values of their local communities. They are not controlled by party bosses or corporate donors, but are instead accountable directly to their constituents. This fundamental difference shapes their approach to policy, their engagement with voters, and their overall role in our democracy.

Key Strengths of Community Independents:

• Deep Community Connection: Community independents are deeply rooted in their electorates, often having lived and worked in the area for many years. They understand the unique challenges and opportunities of their communities because they are part of them. This intimate connection means they are better positioned to represent the specific needs and concerns of their constituents. For example, Alex Dyson grew up and was educated in Warrnambool, and Michelle Milthorpe was born and raised in Cootamundra.
• Genuine Independence and Integrity: A core strength of community independents is their freedom from party control. They are not required to "toe the party line" and are able to vote according to their conscience and the best interests of their electorate. This independence is crucial for restoring trust in politics, as they are not beholden to vested interests or party agendas. Many candidates explicitly state that they will not do what a party says.
• Laser Focus on Local Issues: Unlike major parties that often focus on national agendas, community independents prioritize the specific needs of their electorate. They actively consult with their communities to develop policy platforms that address local concerns such as the cost of living, healthcare, infrastructure, and the environment. Alex Dyson, for example, states, "Your priorities are my platform". This focus on local issues ensures that communities are not overlooked by politicians in Canberra.
• Commitment to Practical, Evidence-Based Solutions: Community independents are generally committed to delivering real, practical solutions rather than engaging in political games. They often emphasize collaboration and working with diverse stakeholders to achieve positive outcomes. They frequently use evidence-based approaches to develop their policy positions.
• Diverse Experience Outside Politics: Many community independent candidates have extensive experience in various fields such as medicine, law, journalism, business, and community work. This real-world experience provides them with unique insights and perspectives that can be lacking in career politicians.
• Strong Communication and Engagement: These candidates are highly committed to engaging with their communities through a variety of methods. They actively listen to their constituents, making their contact information readily available. They use websites, newsletters, and social media to keep in contact with the people they represent, and hold local community events. Many have set up local community hubs where people can meet the candidate, learn about their policies, and volunteer.
• Challenging the Status Quo: Community independents actively challenge the established political order and seek to break the hold of the major parties in parliament. They represent a growing movement of people who are demanding genuine community representation and are tired of politics as usual. Allegra Spender, for example, refers to the "cosy duopoly" in Canberra.

The Benefits for Our Democracy

The rise of community independents is not just about individual candidates; it represents a broader shift towards a more accountable and participatory democracy. Their success in recent elections shows that voters are demanding more from their representatives. By voting for community independents, you can contribute to:

• Increased Accountability: With independents holding the balance of power, there is increased scrutiny of government actions and decisions, making them more accountable to the people.
• More Community-Focused Policies: Independent MPs are more likely to support policies that are directly responsive to the needs of their specific electorates. This means that legislation is more likely to reflect the actual concerns of Australians.
• Greater Transparency: A key theme among community independents is a commitment to transparency and integrity in politics. This focus can lead to a more open and honest political system.
• More Independent Voices in Parliament: The presence of more independent voices in parliament can lead to more balanced debate and better outcomes for all Australians. They can work across party lines, finding common ground on important issues.
• A More Vibrant Democracy: Community independents empower local communities and encourage greater participation in the political process. This can revitalize our democracy and make it more responsive to the needs of everyday people. The Community Independents Project aims to put "everyday people at the centre of Australian politics".
• Real Action on Key Issues: Community independents are passionate about addressing key issues such as the rising cost of living, climate change, and the lack of integrity in politics. They have the freedom to advocate strongly for policies that address these issues, without the constraints of party politics.

Looking Ahead to 2025

The 2025 federal election presents a unique opportunity for Australian voters to choose a new kind of representation. By supporting community independent candidates, you can help build a stronger, more vibrant, and more accountable democracy. If you’re tired of the same old political games and want a representative who truly listens to you and works for your community, it might be time to consider voting for a community independent.

It's time for a change. It's time for community-driven politics.

PODCAST: 

The LNP Files: Unpacking a Decade of Dodgy Deals and Dirty Politics

For over a decade, the Liberal-National Party (LNP) has been a fixture in Australian politics. But behind the headlines of policy announcements and election victories, a pattern of controversies and scandals has emerged, raising serious questions about the integrity of the government and its key figures. This blog post delves into the heart of these issues, drawing on documented allegations to reveal a pattern of behaviour that should concern every Australian.

At the centre of many of these allegations is Peter Dutton, a prominent figure in the LNP. His political career has been dogged by a series of controversies and questionable decisions. He has been criticised for making offensive and misogynistic remarks, uttering falsehoods, and engaging in hypocritical behavior. His actions, which have been described as racist, include making comments about "African gang violence" and suggesting that white South African farmers should be given fast-tracked humanitarian visas. He also made comments about "Muslim candidates". Dutton's behaviour extends to a lack of respect for parliamentary process, where he has been accused of "appearance shaming" and using parliamentary privilege to attack individuals.

One of the most telling examples of a potential conflict of interest is the "au pair affair". As Minister for Home Affairs in 2015, Dutton intervened to grant tourist visas to two foreign au pairs who were in breach of their work conditions. This intervention occurred within an hour of receiving a phone call and was facilitated by his connections to a former police colleague and the CEO of the AFL, Gillon McLachlan. The au pairs were employed by McLachlan's cousin, and a $50,000 donation to the Liberal Party followed six months later, raising serious questions about a potential exchange of favors. Dutton's personal intervention to stop the deportation of these and other au pairs further highlights a pattern of ministerial intervention.

But the issues are not limited to Peter Dutton. The sources detail numerous other examples of alleged corruption and misuse of power within the LNP. Angus Taylor is implicated in the illegal poisoning of native grasslands on a property in which he had an interest, and then personally intervened in the investigation. There was also the $80 million water buy-back scheme from a company with links to Taylor, which resulted in a $52 million profit for the company which was registered in the Cayman Islands. These instances raise serious questions about accountability and transparency.

The misuse of public funds appears to be a recurring theme. A $423 million contract was awarded to Paladin, a security company with connections to the Liberal Party, with limited transparency on how the money was spent. The Great Barrier Reef Foundation received $444 million after a "clandestine meeting" with the former Prime Minister, with no clear process for allocation of the funds. There was also a $30 million grant to Foxtel, ostensibly to promote women's sport, yet there is no public record of how this money was spent. In addition, Stuart Robert charged taxpayers over $37,000 for his home internet. These cases underscore a lack of proper process and accountability in the allocation of public funds.

There are also allegations of ministerial interventions in other programs. Bridget McKenzie was criticised for the way she allocated funds in the Community Sports Infrastructure program, where 66% of funds were allocated to Liberal-National Party held seats. Additionally, ministers overruled public service recommendations in the allocation of a $220 million regional jobs and investment packages, and a Liberal Party donor received a $5.5 million jobs and investment grant, despite being ineligible. The Female Facilities and Water Safety Stream program saw $120 million allocated to the construction of pools in marginal coalition seats, with no clear guidelines and some recipients not even wanting the funding.

Beyond the alleged misuse of funds, there are allegations of electoral fraud. In the seat of Dickson, the Liberal Party distributed fake how-to-vote cards designed to mislead Greens voters. Similarly, in the seats of Chisholm and Kooyong, the Liberal Party put up misleading signage in Mandarin to confuse voters of Chinese background. There are also allegations that a Chinese-born Australian was offered money to run as a Liberal candidate and act as a spy for the Chinese government.

The LNP has also been accused of demonstrating a disregard for due process and legal standards. Dutton's department fought a court injunction for a child needing medical treatment, and he proposed changes to citizenship laws that could violate international law.

The sources also allege that a right-wing media deflects attention away from LNP corruption stories towards non-relevant stories. This is a serious allegation, as it suggests that the media is not acting as a check on government power, and is instead actively working to protect the LNP.

These examples paint a picture of a party that has allegedly prioritised personal and political gain over the public interest. They raise questions about the integrity of the government and its key figures, and suggest a need for greater scrutiny, accountability, and anti-corruption measures. It's also notable that despite these allegations, the LNP continues to win elections. It's a question of whether the electorate is aware of the full extent of these issues, or whether there is a media bias that is preventing the truth from getting out to the public.

Podcast: Dutton's Dodgy Deals and Dirty Politics: Unpacking the LNP's Controversies

A relevant image that needs updating:

Sources:

https://newpolitics.com.au/2020/02/20/a-short-history-of-corruption/

https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/65-reasons-why-dutton-is-unfit-to-be-pm,18924

Dutton's Nuclear Dream: A Political Ploy or a Real Plan for Australia's Future?

Let's face it, the topic of nuclear power in Australia has become more of a political football than a genuine discussion about our energy future. The Coalition, under Peter Dutton, has pushed nuclear energy as a key policy, but is it actually a viable solution, or just a way to score political points? Looking at the evidence, the likelihood of Dutton's nuclear plan coming to fruition seems increasingly remote.

Internal Divisions and Doubts

One of the most telling aspects of the Coalition's nuclear policy is the level of internal skepticism it has generated. Key figures within the Liberal and National parties have openly expressed doubts about its practicality and feasibility. Senator Matt Canavan, a prominent Nationals figure, admitted the policy is primarily a "political fix". He confessed that the Coalition is "latching on to it as a silver bullet" because it addresses a political need for a low-emission and reliable energy source, not because it is the most cost-effective option. In his own words, "it ain't the cheapest form of power".

Adding to this, former Liberal cabinet minister Christopher Pyne has also cast serious doubts on the plan’s viability, stating that the likelihood of a nuclear power plant actually being commissioned in Australia is "limited". He suggests that the Coalition is well aware that the plan is unlikely to succeed but has used it to unify the party and shift the climate debate away from coal and towards accepting action on climate change.

These comments from high-profile figures reveal a significant lack of confidence within the Coalition itself regarding the practical implementation of their own nuclear policy. It begs the question: If those within the party doubt it, why should the voters believe it?

Cost and Practicality Concerns

Beyond internal skepticism, there are significant concerns about the cost and practicality of nuclear power in Australia. The CSIRO, a national science institute, has indicated that nuclear generation would be twice as expensive as renewables, even when accounting for the longer lifespan of nuclear plants. This undermines the Coalition's claim that nuclear is an economically sound choice.

Furthermore, the proposed plan involves building seven nuclear power plants, a complex and time-consuming process that requires significant state government support. Given that some state governments are opposed to nuclear power, it’s hard to see how this plan could proceed without substantial hurdles. Queensland LNP Leader David Crisafulli, for example, does not support the Dutton plan for a nuclear power station in his state and has ruled out lifting the state ban on nuclear power if elected.

These practical and financial barriers are not just minor speed bumps; they are significant obstacles that make the likelihood of the plan’s success very low.

A Political Tool, Not a Genuine Solution

The evidence suggests that the nuclear policy is more of a political strategy than a genuine pursuit of affordable and efficient energy. The primary goal appears to be to unify the Liberal and National parties on a climate strategy and to project an image of climate action without fully embracing renewable energy. As Malcolm Pyne pointed out, by the time anyone realizes that a nuclear power plant is unlikely to be commissioned, the election cycle will have passed. This suggests the policy is primarily designed for short-term political gain rather than long-term energy solutions.

Even Keith Pitt, a Nationals MP who has since quit politics, admitted that the nuclear position is a "bold one to take" that is necessary to win an election from opposition. This further reinforces the idea that the policy's main objective is to provide a politically attractive alternative to renewables, rather than a practical energy solution.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Peter Dutton's nuclear power policy appears to be built on shaky foundations. Internal skepticism, significant cost concerns, practical obstacles, and a clear focus on political gain all suggest that this plan is unlikely to ever be implemented. It is a strategy aimed more at addressing internal party divisions and providing an alternative to renewables, rather than solving Australia's energy needs in a realistic and cost-effective manner. Australian voters should be aware of these realities and consider whether this policy is truly in the nation’s best interest or just a distraction from real climate action and sustainable energy solutions.

The sources make it clear: This is more about politics than power, and voters deserve better.

PODCAST: Dutton's Nuclear Gamble: Politics Over Power?

Sources:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-20/canavan-coalition-not-serious-nuclear-keith-pitt-quits/104749828

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/limited-ex-lib-dashes-dutton-s-nuclear-goal/ar-AA1x4Huj?

[PDF] Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade ... https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Committees/fadt_ctte/estimates/add_1516/def/Defence_Responses.pdf

Peter Dutton's nuclear plan would mean at least 12 more years of coal https://grattan.edu.au/news/peter-duttons-nuclear-plan-would-mean-at-least-12-more-years-of-coal/

Former Liberal minister Christopher Pyne says Peter Dutton's ... https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/sustainability/former-liberal-minister-christopher-pyne-says-peter-duttons-nuclear-pitch-unlikely-to-succeed/news-story/476194346de1a3af83c9c91b35efce30

Peter Dutton has promised to solve our energy problems – but his ... https://theconversation.com/peter-dutton-has-promised-to-solve-our-energy-problems-but-his-nuclear-policy-still-leaves-australians-in-the-dark-232816

[PDF] Senate Official Hansard - Parliament of Australia https://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/hansard/senate/dailys/ds140508.pdf

Chris Bowen MP - You're not going to believe what this... - Facebook https://www.facebook.com/chrisbowenmp/posts/youre-not-going-to-believe-what-this-coalition-mp-said-about-nuclear-power/1124453329038820/

Atomic power probe shows experts divided on nuclear energy https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/politics/peter-dutton-says-he-respects-new-qld-lnp-premiers-antinuclear-stance/news-story/2e6d5000a0e988ecb504f1600ff20825

Nuclear power will never happen in Australia. This is why Dutton ... https://www.reddit.com/r/australian/comments/1hvd850/nuclear_power_will_never_happen_in_australia_this/

The cost of Peter Dutton's weird obsession with nuclear https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/resources/duttons-uncosted-nuclear-risks-energy-security/

The Age - Opinion: Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's policy... https://www.facebook.com/100064645965636/posts/995201509311372/

Economic meltdown: Counting the real cost of Peter Dutton's nuclear ... https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/resources/economic-meltdown-counting-the-real-cost-of-peter-duttons-nuclear-fantasy/

Opinion: Opposition Leader... - The Sydney Morning Herald https://www.facebook.com/sydneymorningherald/posts/opinion-opposition-leader-peter-duttons-nuclear-policy-will-almost-certainly-nev/1030130035821710/

Tina Perinotto on LinkedIn: Dutton's nuclear plan will never happen ... https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tinaperinotto_duttons-nuclear-plan-will-never-happen-activity-7282165892489093120-Bhof

Nuclear power will never happen in Australia. This is why Dutton ... https://www.reddit.com/r/australian/comments/1hvd850/nuclear_power_will_never_happen_in_australia_this/

Peter Dutton refuses to divulge costs of going nuclear at anticipated ... https://www.reddit.com/r/AustralianPolitics/comments/1fngqbu/peter_dutton_refuses_to_divulge_costs_of_going/

Video has emerged of Nationals senator Matt Canavan labelling his ... https://www.reddit.com/r/friendlyjordies/comments/1hiafil/video_has_emerged_of_nationals_senator_matt/

Hansard - Senate 25/03/2024 Parliament of Australia https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber%2Fhansards%2F27583%2F&sid=0035

Under the Opposition's nuclear scheme Australians will pay more to ... https://minister.dcceew.gov.au/bowen/media-releases/under-oppositions-nuclear-scheme-australians-will-pay-more-sit-dark

I wish to apologise for Peter Dutton not having released the costings ... https://www.instagram.com/chrisbowenmp/p/DDK2mSiT2HC/

Dutton's nuclear remarks spark calls for clarity on Queensland LNP's ... https://www.queenslandconservation.org.au/duttons_nuclear_remarks_lnps_energy_plan

Dutton's nuclear delusion an exercise in stupidity https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/duttons-nuclear-delusion-an-exercise-in-stupidity,18797